David Robinson v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20238:23-cv-00803California4,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 DAVID ROBINSON, an individual; NINA ROBINSON, an individual, Case No. 8:23-cv-00803 JWH (JDEx)

Plaintiffs,

vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS,

INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, dba QUEST DIAGNOSTICS; DOES 1 through 15, [Note Changes by the Court] inclusive, 15 Defendant. 16 Based on the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 14) , as modified by the Court under the applicable authorities, and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.