Erick Silva-Suarez v. Kelly Santoro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 Case No. 8: 21-cv-00443-SSS-SK ERICK SILVA-SUAREZ,
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY HABEAS PETITION
KELLY SANTORO,
12 Respondent.
14 In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the attached Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) to deny the habeas petition, any pertinent records as needed, and Petitioner’s objections. [Dkt. 18]. The Court has reviewed de novo those identifiable portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has timely and properly objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In doing so, the Court declines to consider any arguments raised for the first time only in the objections. See United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621–23 (9th Cir. 2000). It also declines to consider objections that simply repeat arguments fully addressed but rejected in the R&R. See Trejo Perez v. Madden, 2020 WL…