Ronnie Parham v. City of West Covina

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20232:21-cv-09114California4,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 12 RONNIE PARHAM, Case No. 2:21-cv-09114-FLA-GJS Plaintiff, Honorable Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish vs. First Street Courthouse, Crtrm 6B C NI . T RY O O BLF EW SE (#S 4T 5 C 1)O ; V OI FN FA IC; EO RF FICER [PROPOSED] STIPULATED CARLOS GONZALEZ (#444);

PROTECTIVE ORDER1

OFFICER A. HERNANDEZ (#395);

OFFICER MATTHEW MUNOZ (#445) and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 23 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 24 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 25 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer

27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.