Ronnie Parham v. City of West Covina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 12 RONNIE PARHAM, Case No. 2:21-cv-09114-FLA-GJS Plaintiff, Honorable Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish vs. First Street Courthouse, Crtrm 6B C NI . T RY O O BLF EW SE (#S 4T 5 C 1)O ; V OI FN FA IC; EO RF FICER [PROPOSED] STIPULATED CARLOS GONZALEZ (#444);
PROTECTIVE ORDER1
OFFICER A. HERNANDEZ (#395);
OFFICER MATTHEW MUNOZ (#445) and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 23 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 24 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 25 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer
27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective…