Milos Product Tanker Corporation v. Valero Marketing and Supply Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20232:22-cv-01545California9,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 8, 2022, plaintiff Milos Product Tanker Corporation, (“Milos”), filed this action against defendant Valero Marketing and Supply Company, (“Valero”), alleging claims for breach of contract and money had and received. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff's claims arise out of an ocean voyage charter party and therefore comprise admiralty and maritime claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(h) and 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1). Id. J 1. On April 20, 2022, defendant filed an answer. Dkt. 10. On August 4, 2020, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. 21. On November 29, 2022, following a hearing on the matter, the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract claim and granted with leave to amend defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for money had and received. Dkt. 33. On December 8, 2022, plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint alleging claims for breach of contract and money had and received. Dkt. 35. On April 14, 2023, the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. Dkts. 39, 40. On May 1, 2023, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.