Deondre Raglin v. Lichuan Pan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20232:23-cv-02551California2,915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 2:23-cv-02551-MEMF-Ex

DEONDRE RAGLIN,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISIDICTION OVER v. PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

LICHUAN PAN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PAN

REVOCABLE TRUST; and DOES 1 to 10, Defendants. 18

20 Before the Court is the Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause Regarding 21 Supplemental Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Deondre Raglin. ECF No. 11. For the reasons stated 22 herein, the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims 23 and DISMISSES the claims.

26 / / / 27 / / / 28 I. Background A. Factual Background1 Plaintiff Deondre Raglin (“Raglin”) has physical disability with substantial limitation in his ability to walk due to paraplegia related to T8 spinal cord injury; he requires the use of a wheelchair at all times when traveling in public. Compl. ¶ 4. Defendants Lichuan Pan (“Pan”) and Defendants Does 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.