Korttney Elliott v. Great New World Equity LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KORTTNEY ELLIOTT, No. 2:23-cv-05065-JAK (JPRx)

Vv. OVER STATE-LAW CLAIMS

GREAT NEW WORLD EQUITY, LLC, Defendants. 16 17 18

Based on a review of the Complaint (Dkt. 1), the following determinations are || made: The Complaint alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), the Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), || Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53, and other provisions of California law. Dkt. 1 9] 6-7. || Supplemental jurisdiction is the basis for the state-law claims. Id. ¥ 7. District courts may exercise “supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part || of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” 28 || U.S.C. § 1367(a). This “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right.” United Mine …