Clarence Demetrius Tate v. Valerie Horn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE DEMETRIUS TATE, Case No. 2:22-cv-06464-MEMF-PD et al. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiffs, v. VALERIE HORN, et al. 16 Defendants. 17

I. Pertinent Procedural History and Plaintiff’s Claims

On September 9, 2022, Plaintiffs Clarence Tate, William Marshall, Earle Jones, Kumi Kawamura, and Susana Osoy (collectively “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [Dkt. No. 1.] The Complaint alleges that Defendants Valerie Horn, Kylale, LLC, Hasty Yadegaran, Freddy Anaraki, 2401 MLK, LLC, Daum Commercial 22 Real Estate Services, William Michalak, City of Los Angeles, Doe Supervisor, and Does 1-10 23 (collectively “Defendants”) violated several of Plaintiffs’ civil rights guaranteed under the U.S. 24 Constitution and the California Constitution. [Id. at 1-2.] It further alleges that Defendants committed various crimes under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 26 27 1…