Jacqueline McMurtry v. James Farner

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20232:23-cv-00869California4,987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 JACQUELINE MCMURTRY and Case No. 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVCx

CHARLEY C. MCMURTRY SR.,,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

15 Plaintiffs, ORDER 16 v. 17 JAMES FARNER, and DOES 1 18 through 10, inclusive, 19 Defendant. 20 Plaintiffs Jacqueline McMurtry and Charley McMurtry Sr., and Defendant Sergeant James Farner, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 27 28 Protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the Protection it affords from public disclosure and use…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.