Capital Providers of Cambridge Sarnano, LLC v-Kevin Robl

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20232:22-cv-07265California226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-07265-SPG-SK Date July 7, 2023

Title Capital Providers of Cambridge Sarnano, LLC et al v-Kevin Robl et al

Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause by no later than July 19, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Plaintiffs allege this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367 based on claims asserted under federal law. (ECF No. 1 ¶ 17). However, it appears that the only claim asserted under a federal statute is Plaintiffs’ tenth claim for relief. Plaintiffs’ tenth claim is brought under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1348 and 3301. Neither statute provides a private right of action. See, e.g., Tasaka v. Bayview …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.