Ja'Naye Granberry v. Denis R. McDonough

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20232:22-cv-05555California4,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 JA’NAYE GRANBERRY, Case № 2:22-cv-05555-ODW (PVCx)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STRIKE AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

14 DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, MOTION TO DISMISS [13]

15 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION On August 3, 2022, Plaintiff Ja’Naye Granberry, proceeding pro se, filed this 19 civil rights action against Defendant Denis R. McDonough in his official capacity as 20 the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) 21 McDonough now moves to strike certain allegations and to dismiss the Complaint. 22 (Mot. Dismiss & Strike (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 13.) For the following 23 reasons, the Court DENIES the Motion to Strike and GRANTS the Motion to 24 Dismiss.1 25 26

28 1 The Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. BACKGROUND Granberry is an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.