Aric Cho v. Amazon Retail, LLC

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 ARIC CHO, Case № 2:23-cv-03584-ODW (MAAx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION TO DISMISS [25]

14 AMAZON RETAIL, LLC,

15 Defendant.

16 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 18 Complaint. (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 25; see also Proof of 19 Service re Mot., ECF No. 26.) After carefully considering the papers filed in 20 connection with the Motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision 21 without oral argument and therefore VACATES the July 17, 2023 hearing. Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Because Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, the 23 Court GRANTS the Motion. Central District of California Civil Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to 25 file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date 26 designated for hearing the motion. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that…