Mynor Varela v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20232:22-cv-01864California2,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Mynor Varela, ) Case No. 2:22-cv-1864-CAS (AS) ) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS )

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

) v. ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE ) Raymond Madden, ) 15 ) ) Respondent. ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records and files herein, including the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 1, “Petition”), respondent’s Answer to the Petition (Dkt. 6 “Answer.”), respondent’s lodged documents from petitioner’s state proceedings (Dkt. 7), petitioner’s Traverse (Dkt. 9), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 11, “Report”), and petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. 12, “Objection”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters to which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.