Raya Torossian v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20232:23-cv-01453California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYA TOROSSIAN, Case No. 2:23-cv-01453-FLA (AFMx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION

v. 14 1-800-PACK-RAT, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING Defendant removed this action based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. See Dkt. 1. The court ordered the parties to show cause why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 24. The court received and reviewed both parties’ Response to its Order to Show Cause. Dkts. 25 (“Pl. Br.”), 26 (“Defs. Br.”). Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction,” possessing “only that power authorized by the Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994); U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. District courts are presumed to lack jurisdiction unless the contrary appears affirmatively from the record. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.