Estate of Rosendo Olivio v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20232:23-cv-01516California4,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ESTATE OF ROSENDO OLIVIO; CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01516 FMO (Ex) R.O., by and Through her Guardian Ad [Hon. Judge Olguin, USDC-1st Cthse, Ctrm. 6D] Litem, MARICELA GALINDO; R.O. [Mag. Eick, USDC-Roybal Bldg, Ctrm 750] JR, A.G. and C.O., by and Through their Guardian Ad Litem, MARIA

ALEJANDRA CEJA; and MARIA RODRIGUEZ, individually,

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

14 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION v. 16 CITY OF LOS ANGELES; a municipal entity; OFFICER FAVIOLA SALINAS (# 40061); OFFICER KYLE LOCKE (# 37794); and DOES 1-10, individuals,

19 Defendants.

ORDER ON STIPULATION The Court, finding good cause, Orders as follows: 24 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.