Elizabeth McCleney v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH MCCLENEY, Case No. 2:22-cv-01927-FLA (SKx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO REMAND [DKTS. 11, 13]

WYNDHAM VACATION

15 OWNERSHIP, INC., a corporation et al., Defendants. 18 19 RULING Before the court are Plaintiff Elizabeth McCleney’s (“Plaintiff” or “McCleney”) Motion to Amend Complaint, (Dkt. 13, “Motion to Amend” or “MTA”), and Motion to Remand, (Dkt. 11, “Motion to Remand” or “MTR”). Defendants Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. (“WVO”), Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. (“WWO”), and Cara Godfrey (“Godfrey,” and collectively, “Defendants”) oppose both Motions. See Dkt. 20 (“Opp’n to MTR”); Dkt. 21 (“Opp’n to MTA”). Plaintiff filed replies. See Dkt. 22 (“Reply ISO MTA”); Dkt. 23 (“Reply ISO MTR”). The court found…