Marquise Bailey v. Smuel Dina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-04517-MEMF-AGRx MARQUISE BAILEY, Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION O VER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS SHMUEL DINA; and DOES 1 through 10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 On June 8, 2023, Plaintiff Marquise Bailey filed a Complaint against Shmuel Dina and DOES 1 through 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3)a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, CAL. CIV. CODE §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief pursuant to the CAL. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 19955, et seq.; and (5) a claim for negligence. ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges that this Court…