Steven Madick v. Presidio, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20232:22-cv-04349California1,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-04349-MCS-AS Date July 27, 2023 Title Madick v. Presidio, Inc.

Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge

Stephen Montes Kerr Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, ETC. (ECF No. 45)

Plaintiff Steven Madick moves for an order granting him one of four alternative forms of relief: (1) for clarification or reconsideration of the Court’s summary judgment order with respect to his breach of contract claim, (2) for leave to amend his breach claim, (3) for leave to dismiss the case without prejudice, or (4) to remand the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Mot., ECF No. 45-1.) The Court deems the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument and vacates the hearing set for August 21, 2023. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.