Jacquelyn Miller v. Dylan Farris
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2:21-cv-09551-SSS (AS)
JACQUELYN MILLER,
11 Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES
14 DYLAN FERRIS, et al. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Fourth Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff objects that this case was not properly before the Magistrate Judge and that the District Judge had a personal bias or prejudice based on past rulings. [Dkt. 139 at 3, 6-7]. This case was properly referred to the Magistrate Judge. See Washington v. Kijakazi, 72 F.4th 1029, 1029 (9th Cir. 2023) || recommendations on dispositive pretrial…