Justin Tyler Harvey v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:22-cv-07857California4,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUSTIN TYLER H., Case No. 2:22-cv-07857-KES

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v.

ORDER

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

I.

INTRODUCTION

On October 27, 2022, Plaintiff Justin Tyler H. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint for review of denial of social security disability benefits. (Dkt. 1.) Plaintiff filed Plaintiff’s Brief (“PB”) under the Rule 6 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Dkt. 16.) Defendant filed a responding Commissioner’s Brief (“CB”) under the Rule 7. (Dkt. 23.) Plaintiff did not timely reply. (Dkt. 20.) For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is VACATED. 28 II. BACKGROUND In January and February 2020, Plaintiff applied for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.