Nestor Alonso Garcia Sanchez v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:23-cv-02244California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NESTOR ALONSO GARCIA Case No. 2:23-cv-02244-FLA (KSx) SANCHEZ, et al.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Plaintiffs, ACTION SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF

AMERICA, INC., et al. Defendants.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction,” possessing only “power authorized by the Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994); U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. Courts are presumed to lack jurisdiction unless the contrary appears affirmatively from the record. See DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 342 n. 3 (2006). Additionally, federal courts have an obligation to examine jurisdiction sua sponte before proceeding to the merits of a case. See Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999). Federal courts have jurisdiction where an action arises under federal law or where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.