Brenda Perez v. MEC Holding Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20235:23-cv-00279California1,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:23-cv-00279-SSS-KKx Date July 31, 2023 Title Brenda Perez v. MEC Holding Company

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD ACCEPT THE PARTIES’ REQUEST

FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

On July 17, 2023, the Court denied the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal and notified the Parties of the Court’s expectations for dismissal. [Dkt. 29]. The Parties have now filed a new Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (“Joint Stipulation”). [Dkt. 30]. The Court reviews the Joint Stipulation below.

In its Joint Stipulation, the Parties spend a considerable amount of time discussing the application of Diaz v. Tr. Territory of Pac. Islands, 876 F.2d 1401, 1408 (9th Cir. 1989). [Dkt. 30 at 2–4, ¶5]. In particular, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.