Jaime Aguirre v. Kathryn Barger

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:22-cv-06676California1,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME AGUIRRE , ) Case No. CV 22-06676 DDP (MRWx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION ) TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT KATHRYN BARGER, ET AL., ) ) [Dkt. 33] Defendants. ) ___________________________ ) 16 Presently before the court is Defendants Kathryn Barger, Janice Hahn, Holly Mitchell, and Hilda Solis’ Motion to Strike and to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 33). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court grants the motion and adopts the following Order.1 I. Background Plaintiffs initially filed a Complaint alleging, on behalf of a putative class, that while incarcerated in “the Los Angeles 25 1 The court, preferring to decide issues on the merits where 26 possible, has considered both of Plaintiffs’ oppositions and both of Defendants’ replies. (Dkts. 35, 36, 37, 39.) The court 27 reiterates that it expects counsel for all parties to work…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.