Korttney Elliott v. Saul S. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20235:23-cv-01448California476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:23-cv-01448-SSS-RAOx Date July 31, 2023 Title Korttney Elliott v. Saul S. Flores, et al.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD

NOT DENY SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

On July 24, 2023, Plaintiff Korttney Elliott filed her Complaint asserting a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a); a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Acts (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52; a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54.1(a)–(d); a claim for damages pursuant to the California Health & Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; and a claim for damages pursuant to a state law negligence theory. [Dkt. 1]. As the Unruh Act, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.