Carlos Vasquez v. Estee Lauder Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20232:23-cv-04001California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

No. 2:23-cv-04001-ODW (SKx) Date July 31, 2023 Title Carlos Vasquez et al. v. Estee Lauder Inc.

Present: The Honorable Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge Sheila English Not reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not present Not present Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Propriety of Discovery

In the Rule 26(f) Report, (Rpt., ECF No. 11), the parties indicate that they disagree about whether it is appropriate to allow for discovery in this case. Defendant argues that resolution of this case should be confined to the Administrative Record and that discovery is therefore inappropriate. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff argues that it is appropriate to allow for written discovery and depositions related to a variety of topics. (Id.)

The default rule in Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) cases is that judicial review is typically confined to the administrative record. Stago v. Off. of Navajo & Hopi Indian Relocation, 562 F. Supp.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.