Superclinics USA, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20232:23-cv-00699California3,273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 SUPERCLINICS USA, INC., Case № 2:23-cv-00699-ODW (MAAx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. 14 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., MOTION TO DISMISS [10]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Superclinics USA, Inc. initiated this action against Defendant 19 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) in Los Angeles County Superior Court, 20 alleging claims based in fraud and negligence. (See Notice Removal (“Notice”) Ex. 2 21 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-2.) Chase removed the action to this Court and now moves to 22 dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules” or 23 “Rule”) 12(b)(6) and 9(b). (Mot. Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”) 2–4, ECF No. 10.) 24 For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Chase’s Motion WITH LEAVE TO 25 AMEND.1 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.