DJCBP Corporation v. City of Baldwin Park

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20232:23-cv-00384California1,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL ‘oO’ Case No. 2:23-cv-00384-CAS (PVCx) Date August 3, 2023 Title DJCBP CORPORATION, ET AL. V. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, ET AL.

Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) - CITY’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Dkt. 27, filed on JULY 13, 2023) The Court finds that defendant’s motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78: C.D. Cal. L-.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the matter is hereby taken under submission. On January 18, 2023, plaintiffs DJCBP Corporation d/b/a/ Tier One Consulting (“Tier One Consulting’’) and David Ju initiated this action against defendants City of Baldwin Park (the “City”); Robert Nacionales Tafoya, former Baldwin Park City Attorney; Anthony Willoughby II, former Baldwin Park Deputy City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.