Edward Littlejohn v. Calif Dept. of State Hospitals

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:22-cv-09223California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD LITTLEJOHN, Case No. 2:22-cv-09223-JWH (BFM)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

v. STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF STATE

HOSPITALS,

14 Respondent. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 28.) Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends that Petitioner’s habeas petition be dismissed as moot because Petitioner has been released from the term of commitment that he had challenged in the Petition. (ECF No. 28.) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (ECF No. 29) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation, for the reasons set forth below. In his Objections, Petitioner does not dispute the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.