Jonathan Peltz v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20232:22-cv-03106California5,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 || Charles E. Slyngstad (SBN 89103) E-mail: cslyngstad@bwslaw.com 2 || Brian S. Ginter (SBN 265786 E-mail: bginter@bwslaw.com 3 || Kyle Anne Piasecki (SBN 311961) Email: RDLASECKIGL Duy slaw com || BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 5 || Los Angeles, CA 90071-2953 ‘ Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Defendant CITY GF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JONATHAN PELTZ and KATHLEEN Case No. 2:22-cv-03106-MWF-AGR GALLAGHER

PROPOSED} STIPULATED

Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER RE:

DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL

14 || v. INFORMATION 15 || CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; CHIEF MICHEL 16 || MOORE, a public entity, and DOES {Discovery Document: Referred to through 10, inclusive, agistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg] 17 Defendants. 18 19 1. ENERAL GEN >] 1.1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.