Mirna Bonilla Mendoza v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20232:23-cv-04783California1,922 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIRNA BONILLA MENDOZA, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-04783-FLA (RAOx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

17 RULING On May 15, 2023, Plaintiffs Mirna Bonilla Mendoza and Byron Alvarez (“Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) and DOES 1 through 10 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-2, Ex. A (“Compl.”). The Complaint alleges two causes of action, both stemming from the Song-Beverly Act. Id. Plaintiffs seek actual damages, civil penalties, and attorney’s fees. Id. On June 16, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. In its Notice of Removal, Defendant alleges the court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.