Jose Arceo v. Ardent Mills, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20235:23-cv-01146California2,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 5:23-cv-01146-AB-E Date: August 9, 2023

Title: Jose Arceo v. Ardent Mills, LLC et al

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND [DKt. No. 10] and DENYING DEFEDANT?’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE A SUR-REPLY [Dkt. No. 15] Before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Arceo’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand (“Motion,” Dkt. No. 10). Defendant Ardent Mills LLC (“Defendant”) filed an opposition and Plaintiff filed a reply. Defendant also filed an Ex Parte Application to File Sur-reply (“Ex Parte Application,” Dkt. No. 15) that Plaintiff opposed. The Court will resolve these matters without oral argument and therefore VACATES the August 11, 2023 hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78, C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Plaintiff's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.