Marco Antonio Casillas v. Ken Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 MARCO ANTONIO CASILLAS, Case No. 2:21-cv-01267-SPG (MAR) Petitioner, v.
KEN CLARK, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
Respondent. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Respondent and Plaintiff have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Within Claim Four, Petitioner has presented an argument pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), ECF No. 1 at 10, ECF No. 1-5 at 14-17, which was not explicitly addressed in the Report and Recommendation. The Court has considered Petitioner’s argument and finds it does not warrant federal habeas relief. Even if the Court were to assume, without deciding, that police…