Warden

James Diep v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20238:23-cv-00355California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. SA CV 23-355 ODW (MRW) Date August 10, 2023 Title Diep v. Warden

Present: Hon. Michael R. Wilner, U.S. Magistrate Judge James Muñoz n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

1. In June 2023, the Attorney General moved to dismiss this habeas action on procedural grounds. (Docket # 13.) The Court issued an order requiring Petitioner to respond to the motion by July 21, 2023. (Docket # 15.) To date, Petitioner has not filed any response to the motion or the Court’s order. 2. Petitioner is ordered to show cause why the motion should not be granted for the grounds stated by the Attorney General and for Petitioner’s failure to oppose the motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. Petitioner’s response to the OSC and his substantive response to the motion are due by or before August 31, 2023. Petitioner is advised that the failure to respond to this order will lead the Court to conclude that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.