Nancy McMillan v. City of Glendora

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20232:22-cv-08100California4,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 NANCY McMILLAN, an individual, Case No.: 2:22-cv-08100 AB (PVCx) 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE vs. ORDER 13 CITY OF GLENDORA, a municipal 14 entity; DANIEL GIGLIOBIANCO, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for 16 Glendora Police Department; DANNY MOUAWAD, individually and in his official capacity as a police 18 officer for Glendora Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually and in their 20 official capacity as police officers for Glendora Police Department,

22 Defendants.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

24 By and through their counsel of record in this action, Plaintiff NANCY 25 McMILLAN (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants CITY OF GLENDORA, DANIEL 26 GIGLIOBIANCO, and DANNY MOUAWAD ("Defendants") – the Parties – hereby 27 stipulate for the purpose of jointly requesting that the Honorable Court enter a protective order regarding the confidential documents in in this matter [and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.