Darcel Harris v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20232:23-cv-04339California2,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARCEL HARRIS, by and through him, C ase No. 2:23-cv-04339-SPG-JPR

T.H., his minor child, and DAPHNE ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO REMAND AND ALTERNATIVE

HAYWOOD, individually and on behalf MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL

of all others similarly situated, DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 19]

Plaintiffs,

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant. 20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Darcel Harris, by and through T.H., his minor child, and Daphne Haywood’s motion to remand. (ECF No. 19). Defendant Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles opposes. (ECF No. 23). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Central District of California Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand without prejudice and GRANTS Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.