Raul Uriarte Limon v. Ontario Pharmacy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20235:23-cv-01498California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—

GENERAL

Case No. 5:23-cv-01498-SHK Date August 14, 2023 Title Raul Uriarte-Limon v. Ontario Pharmacy, Inc. et al

SHASHI H. KEWALRAMANI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

Present: The Honorable

JUDGE

Danalyn Cisneros Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT

DENY SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

The complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). See “Complaint,” Electronic Case Filing Number 1. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state-law claim that Plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.