A.R.L.
A.R.L. v. City of Fullerton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS -
5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 8:21-CV-00929-FWS-JDE A.R.L.,
Plaintiff,
v. JUDGMENT 14 CITY OF FULLERTON, et al.,
16 Defendants.
18 19 /// 20 /// 22 ///
25 26 27 28 I The court held oral argument on the Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion’’) 2 || filed by Defendants City of Fullerton, Matthew Green, and Rene Valdes (collectively, “Defendants”) on April 13, 2023, and thereafter took the Motion under submission. (Dkt. 59.) After full consideration of the papers, evidence, oral argument, and authorities submitted by the parties, as well as the briefs and any other relevant information in the court’s files and/or filed with the court in connection with the Motion, the court issued an order GRANTING summary judgment for Defendants on each of Plaintiff A.R.L.’s (‘Plaintiff’) claims for excessive force under 42 U.S.C. 9 § 1983; unconstitutional policy, practice, or custom under Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. 10 Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978); violation…