Sonia Agresti v. Federal Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20232:23-cv-04555California2,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

The facts are drawn from Plaintiffs’ Complaint. This action arises from a settlement agreement pertaining to a homeowner’s insurance policy Plaintiffs purchased from Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) for their home in Agoura Hills, California. (Compl., Doc. 1-2 ¶¶ 16, 20.) On November 9, 2018, a wildfire caused damage to Plaintiffs’ property. (Id. ¶ 17.) Plaintiffs timely submitted a claim to Federal for losses including damage to their land, structures, personal property, trees and landscaping, and cost of additional living expenses. (Id. at 18.) A dispute between Plaintiffs and Federal

1 On August 9, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to File Sur-Reply. (Doc. 25.) This Motion is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the Court’s ruling. ____________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:23-cv-04555-JLS-MAR Date: August 16, 2023 Title: Sonia Agresti et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al as to the extent of coverage under the insurance policy arose, and on December 2, 2019, Plaintiffs and Federal entered into a settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.