Antonia Pineda v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20232:23-cv-02377California1,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIA PINEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-02377-FLA (AFMx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

14 CVS PHARMACY, INC, et al., Defendants.

17 RULING On November 10, 2022, Plaintiff Antonia Pineda (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (“Defendant” or “CVS”), LILY DOE, and DOES 1 through 50 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). The Complaint asserts state-law claims for general negligence and premises liability based on a slip-and-fall incident at a CVS store location. Id. On March 30, 2023, Defendant removed the action to this court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1. In its Notice of Removal, Defendant alleges the court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the amount in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.