Alberto Hernandez v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20235:22-cv-01977California878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:22-cv-01977-ODW-AJR Date: August 24, 2023 Page 1 of

Title: Alberto Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANT JOHN DOE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

4(m)

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On November 4, 2022, Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 1999. (Dkt. 1 “Complaint”.) The Complaint sued Michael Monk, a former doctor at United States Penitentiary Victorville (“USP Victorville); Felipe Martinez, the former warden at USP Victorville; and John Doe, “medical personnel at USP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.