Tomas Ramirez v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20232:23-cv-04204California2,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMAS RAMIREZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-04204-FLA (ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

14 FCA US, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RULING On April 28, 2023, Plaintiff Tomas Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendants FCA US, LLC (“FCA”) and DOES 1 through 20 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1. Plaintiff brings, among others, two claims under the Song-Beverly Act and one under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Id. On May 31, 2023, FCA removed the action to this court based on alleged diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. 1 (“NoR”). On July 31, 2023, the court ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to an insufficient amount in controversy. Dkt. 30. Both Plaintiff and 10…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.