Omar Luna v. Case Liquors, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20232:23-cv-06476California2,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

United States District Court Central District of California Western Dibision 11 OMAR LUNA, CV 23-06476 TJH(Ex) Painatt, Orver to Show Cause

CASE LIQUORS, INC., Defendant. 17 The Complaint filed in this case alleged a claim for injunctive relief for an 19 || alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010-12213 20 || ["ADA"], and a claim for damages pursuant to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, || Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51- ["Unruh Act"]. It appears that the Court possesses only 22 || supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim that 23 || Plaintiff may have alleged, if any. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Section 1367 "reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise 25 || supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and 26 || at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, 27 || and comity.'" City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.