Arthur Andrew Andrade v. Debbie Asuncion

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20232:18-cv-00553California1,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No. 2: 18-cv-00553-SSS-MAR ARTHUR ANDREW ANDRADE,

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF v. UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEBBIE ASUNCION, et al.

16 Respondents.

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report recommends that the First Amended Petition be denied and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. [Dkt. 100]. Petitioner’s Objections to the Report, [Dkt. 116], do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s Petitioner objects that the Report erroneously summarizes the record based on an inapplicable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.