Jesus Lizarraga v. James Robertson
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20232:23-cv-05411California2,985 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 23-5411 JWH (PVC) Date: August 28, 2023 Title Jesus Lizarraga v. Stephen Smith, Acting Warden
Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge
Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None
PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT IS UNTIMELY
On May 15, 2023, Petitioner, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructive filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the Northern District of California. (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1 at 6). The Petition appears to raise two grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) ineffective assistance of trial counsel and (2) violation of due process. (Id. at 5). On June 29, 2023, the case was transferred to this court. (Dkt. No.
1 Pursuant to the mailbox rule, “[w]hen a prisoner gives prison authorities a habeas petition or other pleading to mail to court, the court deems the petition…