Freddy Leyva v. Jeri Shepherd

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20232:23-cv-00990California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FREDDY LEYVA, Case No. CV 23-00990 SSS (RAO)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

JERI SHEPHERD, et al., RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants. 17 Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) dated July 13, 2023, Dkt. No. 21, Plaintiff’s Letter received August 7, 2023, which the Court construes as Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report, Dkt. No. 23, and all other records and files herein. The Court has further engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected and does not find that Plaintiff’s objections have merit. Specifically, Plaintiff’s objections regarding gum pain and tooth sensitivity do not warrant a change to the Report’s finding that Plaintiff has failed to 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.