Quy Truong v. Mart Logistics Center CA Property Owner LP
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20238:23-cv-01312California527 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 23-01312-CJC (ADSx) Date: August 29, 2023
Title: QUY TRUONG v. MART LOGISTICS CENTER CA PROPERTY OWNER LP
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY
THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM
On July 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Compl.].) Plaintiff contends that this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. (Id.)
Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). District courts have discretion to decline to exercise…