Quy Truong v. Mart Logistics Center CA Property Owner LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20238:23-cv-01312California527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SACV 23-01312-CJC (ADSx) Date: August 29, 2023

Title: QUY TRUONG v. MART LOGISTICS CENTER CA PROPERTY OWNER LP

PRESENT:

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY

THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM

On July 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Compl.].) Plaintiff contends that this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. (Id.)

Supplemental jurisdiction “is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right.” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). District courts have discretion to decline to exercise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.