Rosalinda Celaya v. Walmart Inc.
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20232:23-cv-04489California565 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. 2:23-cv-04489-JLS-RAO Date: August 30, 2023 Title: Rosalinda Celaya v. Walmart Inc. et al
Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Gabby Garcia _ N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
Not Present Not Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 14)
Before the Court is Plaintiff Rosalinda Celaya’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (Mot., Doc. 14), which Defendant Walmart Inc. (“Defendant”) opposed (Opp., Doc. 19). Plaintiff argues that the presence of Doe 1 in this action undermines there being complete diversity between the parties. (Mot., Doc. 14-1 at 3–6). Defendant argues that the Court should disregard Doe 1 when determining whether complete diversity exists. (Opp., Doc. 19 at 10–14). The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument, and the hearing set for September 1, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D.…