Pedro Valle v. United Stated of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20232:23-cv-00583California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEDRO VALLE, CV 23-0583 DSF (JC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECOMMENDATIONS OF

et al., UNITED STATES Respondents. MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND

DIRECTING RESPONSE TO

PETITION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”), the parties’ submissions in connection with respondents’ Motion to Dismiss the Petition, and all of the records herein, including the June 5, 2023 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”) and respondents’ objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be denied because respondents have failed to demonstrate that dismissal is warranted at this juncture based on a failure to exhaust all available administrative remedies. In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.