AirDoctor, LLC v. Homeburg Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20232:23-cv-00352California4,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP Danielle S. Futterman, pro hac vice 2 dfutterman@ipcounselors.com 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250 New York, NY 10165 Telephone: 212-292-5390 Facsimile: 212-292-5391 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Peter J. Farnese (SBN 251204) 6 pfarnese@ipcounselors.com 700 South Flower Street, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 310-356-4668 Facsimile: 310-388-1232

Attorneys for Plaintiff, AirDoctor, LLC 11 Jen-Feng Lee, SBN 204328 jflee@ltpacificlaw.com Kenneth K. Tanji, Jr., SBN 162273 13 ktanji@ltpacificlaw.com LT Pacific Law Group, LLP 17800 Castleton Street, #560 City of Industry, CA 91748

T: 626-810-7200

F: 626-810-7300

17 Attorneys for Defendants Homeburg, Inc. Replacement-parts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AIRDOCTOR, LLC., CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-00352-DMG Plaintiff,

23 v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

HOMEBURG LIMITED, HOMEBURG ORDER

INC. and REPLACEMENT-PARTS,

26 Defendants. 27 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.