Kerry Lamons v. Glanbia Performance Nutrition NA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20235:23-cv-00654California2,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9

11 KERRY LAMONS, Case № 5:23-cv-00654-ODW (KKx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS [20]

GLANBIA PERFORMANCE

15 NUTRITION (NA), Inc. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kerry Lamons brings this putative class action against Defendant 21 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (NA) Inc. (“Glanbia”), alleging Glanbia purposely 22 misrepresents the calorie contents of certain nutritional powders. (First. Am. Compl. 23 (“FAC”), ECF No. 18.) Glanbia now moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 25 No. 20-1.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Glanbia’s Motion.1 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15 II. BACKGROUND On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.