Jasmine Williams v. City of Beverly Hills

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20232:21-cv-08698California295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

No. CV 21-8698 FMO (RAOx) Date September 6, 2023 Title Jasmine Williams, et al. v. City of Beverly Hills

Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions or Dismissal Pursuant to the Court’s Order of February 28, 2023, the parties were required to complete a settlement conference before a private mediator no later than August 29, 2023. (See Dkt. 142, Court’s Order of February 28, 2023, at 5). If the case settled, the parties were required to file a Notice of Settlement no later than 24 hours after settlement. (See id.). Otherwise, the parties were required to file a Status Report Re: Settlement no later than 48 hours after the settlement conference was complete. (See id.). As of the filing date of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.